7/2/2023 0 Comments Beck depression inventory pdf![]() This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.įunding: The research was funded by the Regional Competence Centre for Double Diagnoses, South Eastern Norway, and the research fund in the Community Mental Health Center, Vinderen, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo. Received: AugAccepted: JanuPublished: February 12, 2014Ĭopyright: © 2014 Skule et al. PLoS ONE 9(2):Įditor: Brett Thombs, McGill University, Canada (2014) Depressive Symptoms in People with and without Alcohol Abuse: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Across Groups. It is argued that patients with comorbid depression and alcohol abuse should be offered parallel and adequate treatment for both conditions.Ĭitation: Skule C, Ulleberg P, Dallavara Lending H, Berge T, Egeland J, Brennen T, et al. The magnitude of the differences in latent mean scores suggested a moderate difference in the level of depressive symptoms between the two groups. MIMIC (multiple-indicator-multiple-cause) modeling showed that the level of depressive symptoms was found to be highest on both factors in the group with comorbid alcohol problems. Evidence for strict measurement invariance across the two groups for the SA-C model was found. The SA-C model was preferred due to its more parsimonious nature. In a sample of 358 patients without alcohol problems and 167 patients with comorbid alcohol problems, confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the same factor structures, Beck et al.'s two-factor Somatic Affective-Cognitive (SA-C) model, and Buckley et al.'s three-factor Cognitive-Affective- Somatic (C-A-S) model, demonstrated the best fit to the data in both groups. J Clin Psychol.This study explored differences in the factor structure of depressive symptoms in patients with and without alcohol abuse, and differences in the severity of depressive symptoms between the two groups. These results generally support the internal consistency and the construct validity of the BDI-S.Ĭopyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Factor analysis revealed that the factor loading for the BDI-S was congruent with dimensions of depression reported in the literature. ![]() The correlation coefficients between the BDI-S and instruments that measured other constructs (not depression) were lower than the correlation coefficients between instruments that measured the same constructs. The coefficient of internal consistency obtained for the 22 BDI-S items was.88. The participants who agreed to participate in the study and signed the consent form completed self-report measures related to depression (BDI-S, CES-D, and LCSd-7), dysfunctional cognition (DAS-A and IBT), stressful life events (LES), and social support (CAS). A sample of 351 undergraduate students at the University of Puerto Rico participated in this study. This study has two objectives: (a) to revise, develop, and adapt a Spanish language BDI (BDI-S) that takes the criteria for the diagnosis of major depression according to the DSM-IV into consideration and (b) to evaluate the psychometric properties (internal reliability and construct validity) of the revised version of the BDI (BDI-S). ![]() The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a widely used self-report measure for depression. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |